Washington / DC. (ota) The rigorous and proven regulatory system of the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA’s) National Organic Program has established a deep trust in USDA certified organic food products by American consumers. Now, consumers need to be able to carry over this well-earned trust in organic food to cosmetics, household cleaners and other non-food products claiming to be organic, the Organic Trade Association (OTA) will tell Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and USDA officials at a public round-table this week.
The FTC and USDA will co-host a round-table to help better understand how consumers perceive organic claims on items outside the food aisles, and to determine if the FTC needs to issue further guidance to makers of non-food products that use the organic claim or term, but do not use the USDA Organic seal or make any reference to organic certification.
Invited to participate in the discussion, OTA will present the findings of a research study recently conducted for OTA exploring consumers’ attitudes, understanding and expectations surrounding organic claims and specifically the labelling of organic non-food products and services.
«American consumers need to trust in the organic label and in organic claims, whether those labels are on organic produce and organic milk or on shampoo and sheets», said Laura Batcha, CEO and Executive Director of OTA. «Our survey shows consumers who are buying organic feel that both organic food products and non-food products claiming to be organic should be regulated in the same manner. Consumers are confident there are standards and government oversight on the organic label for food, and they deserve to have that same confidence for all products with the organic claim».
A gap in the regulatory system
For more than 15 years, the National Organic Program (NOP) has regulated and enforced strict organic standards for agricultural products. However, NOP’s enforcement authority does not extend to certain types of non-food or non-agricultural products, such as personal care products, detergent and cosmetics. As a result, food products in stores have to be certified by USDA to carry the organic label, or risk being found guilty of fraud and slapped with civil penalties and other enforcement actions. But non-agricultural products like household cleaners or personal care items are able to use organic claims whether they are certified or not. If a non-agricultural product does not use the USDA Organic seal and does not make reference to certification, that product can still use the term «organic», and do so without any federal oversight and enforcement.
«Consumers trust and understand that certified organic food products meet strict standards, and that those standards are regulated and enforced by the federal government», said Angela Jagiello, OTA’s Associate Director for Conference and Product Development, who will present the findings of the OTA study at the round-table. «The regulatory gap for non-agricultural products is a major hole in the organic regulatory system. It creates consumer confusion and unfair competition for companies that get their products certified, and ultimately undermines the organic label».
The Federal Trade Commission, under its consumer protection jurisdiction, has authority to act on misleading or fraudulent «organic» claims on products that fall outside NOP’s purview but has not exercised that authority because FTC has said it is uncertain what consumers think when they see the term «organic». OTA has been meeting regularly with FTC and NOP since 2012 to urge FTC to exercise its consumer protection authority regarding organic claims.
Protecting the integrity of organic
OTA has urged FTC to confer with NOP and develop a draft enforcement policy for organic claims on non-food products that are outside NOP’s authority, and has stressed that not enforcing organic claims in all products could risk diluting the integrity of and trust in the organic seal. As a result of OTA’s advocacy, FTC and USDA co-funded a survey in 2015 of more than 8,000 consumers on their understanding of organic claims on products outside NOP’s scope of authority. The results of that study show confusion as to whether organic claims on non-food products mean the same as on food products, and inaccurate understandings about USDA regulation and certification of organic claims for non-food products.
The FTC-USDA round-table will discuss the findings of that survey and approaches to address potential misleading and deceptive claims.
«The information that FTC and USDA gather should ultimately provide the agencies with increased understanding on how and when to act on the fraudulent use of the term «organic» on products that fall outside of NOP’s authority», said OTA’s Batcha. «Shoppers need to trust products labelled as «organic», whether they are sold in the food aisle or the personal care aisle. Failure to require certification and enforce the use of the term “organic” on all products can lead to consumers mistrusting the integrity of the word «organic».
Organic sales in the U.S. in 2015 posted new records, with total organic product sales hitting a new benchmark of 43.3 billion USD, up a robust 11 percent from the previous year’s record level, according to OTA’s 2016 Organic Industry Survey. Of the 43.3 billion USD in total organic sales, 39.7 billion USD were organic food sales, up 11 percent from the previous year, with non-food organic products accounting for 3.6 billion USD, up 13 percent.
OTHER TOPICS FROM THIS SECTION FOR YOU:
- NielsenIQ: releases Mid-Year Consumer Outlook 2025
- Lantmännen is funding research project at Chalmers
- Regulation and compliance: Registrar Corp buys Foodsteps
- Lidl US: Launches «Exciting New Bakery Items»
- Greenfood: How fermentation gives food a second life
- NGT: European Parliament backs EU Commission proposal
- Urgent Concerns Regarding EU Decision on GMO Deregulation
- FDF: about the latest ONS food inflation figures
- MetaPath research: public and private players join forces
- VTT: Finnish companies work on new processes for plant proteins
- VTT: Finland makes plant-based meat attractive
- UNRIC on the end of the Grains Agreement: «Everything is possible»
- ICBA: Aspartame safe, reaffirm WHO and FAO
- EU: More sustainable use of plant and soil natural resources
- From farm to fork: Fazer participates in fertiliser research
- UK: 80 percent of households saw disposable income fall
- Good Meat: Gets Full Approval in the U.S. for Cultivated Meat
- Food Safety Confidence Outpaces What Guests Really Know
- Promotion tour: Prime Minister tastes 3D-printed cultivated fish
- New partnership between W.U.R. and Protein Industries Canada